On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:50:12PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote: > > > When upstream had their own pristine-tar branch, it was not possible to > > > use it directly because the .orig.tar.xx is debian specific. This adds > > > the possibility to define a pattern like > > > > Thanks for the patch but I think we're fixing the wrong end. It would be > > better to import the bindelata as .orig.tar.gz in the first place. This > > is what's planned for the dfsg-cleaning work. > I am not sure what you mean by that. Would you care to elaborate a > little ? > > And, by the way, thanks for maintaining this piece of software. It is > very helpful ! I'm actually having a bit of a hard time to understand to see what you want to accomplish. Are you talking about upstream using pristine-tar but a different naming convention for tarballs? Is there a usecase for this/ If so could you add some tests? If so wouldn't we want to be able to specify the exact format? Cheers, -- Guido
P.S.: having patches that don't contain "ugly hack" is an extra bonus ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
