Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you >> > can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in? >> >> I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on sarge (in the etch chroot >> on bruckner, no tetex is installed, so I can' test.) > > OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental, then I > installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can include png files > again. From the debugging so far I conclude that this is not a problem > of the tetex-version and that simply rebuilding the packages in unstable > would close this bug.
Can you test this by recompiling 2.0.2-31? > BTW, I noticed that tetex-extra does not include isolatin1.sty anymore. > Is this intentional? Yes, it is obsolete and should no longer be used. Have a look at l2tabu - when 3.0 is installed, simply "texdoc l2tabu" will bring it up. > 3.0-7 is only in experimental for i386 so far, are you interested in the > ppc packages I built? If you personally know a Debian Developer who is willing to upload them for you, I'd be grateful for this. But I don't think I can upload package that somebody has compiled on a system I don't know about. > While building, lintian produced some warnings. Should I report them in > a different bug? Yes, please. (Of course I know there are lintian warnings; I just didn't have enough time to care about this). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
