retitle 629850 remove "Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common" message thanks
Hi, On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:23:10AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:39:09PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > RE> WTF are you citing libreoffice-common here but then file it against > > openoffice.org-impress? > > > > All I know is the latter has this dependency problem, as that is the > > package I installed. > > Nonsense. Besides that openoffice.org-impress is a empty dummy package. It > has no content > there is no dependency problem here anyway, as I already said in my last mail. (If there was a bug it would be in libreoffice-*, not in a openoffice.org-*) > > Then please kindly reword the warning as such. Ah, you mean "reword". Sorry, read "remove" > No. > > - This thing is coming from a library in -core > - This thing is there for e.g. writer where you need Java for some wizards. > But don't > need it for "normal" functioning. > > No, this will not be removed, if we did this people who don't know those > wizards need > Java and don't read package description/relationships will wonder why they > don't work > if they don't have a (proper) JVM there. Still no. It comes from a core lib which doesn't know what you just installed and it can't read your brain on what you use. If you don't have problems fine, if something's not working for you install the JVM. This warning was patched in from us exactly because of the scenario in the second point above. People just didn't grok they needed a JVM and/or -java-common for some stuff. Maybe you should invest your time in better things than filing "bugs" like this. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
