Roger Leigh wrote: > Sorry, wrong version of second patch; I've attached the correct one.
This was pretty close. I've cleaned it up in the smarter-targets branch, including inlining away recursive calls to debian/rules for implicit targets. See what you think. Note: I have not decided if this is too likely to cause breakage to make it v9 only or not. > To improve performance in dh, have you considered making > rules_explicit_target cache the rules so that the parsing only > needs to be done once per dh invocation? rules_explicit_target is already memoized. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
