Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes:

> I agree with you, but I don't think it's pam-afs-session where the bug is.
> This is a bug that's been bothering me for a long time.  I'm not sure if
> aptitude or dpkg should be cleaning out the environment before invoking
> maintainer scripts, maintainer scripts should be cleaning the environment
> before running invoke-rc.d, or invoke-rc.d should be cleaning the
> environment, but *something* in that path really should.  In the past,

That's fair.  I can make a decent case for dpkg, and will reassign this
bug accordingly; please feel free to chime in post-reassignment if you
feel you have anything to add.

> I've seen debconf environment variables leaked into xinetd and then passed
> along to subsequent user logins, which then breaks subsequent aptitude
> runs.

I haven't hit that failure mode, but I did historically run into trouble
with my TEXMF setting causing TeX-related maintainer scripts to go
overboard (though it looks like sudo does at least filter that out
itself these days).

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to