Le lundi 27 juin 2011 à 19:28 -0400, Anders Kaseorg a écrit : > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Ah. It’s LLVMgold.so, not libLLVMgold.so, > > Well, it is upstream library name. I prefer not to mess with that... > > Oh, I see: this changed between llvm-2.8 and llvm-2.9. llvm-2.8-dev > installs libLLVMgold.so, but llvm-2.9-dev installs LLVMgold.so, and clang > 2.9 only looks for /usr/lib/LLVMgold.so. OK, I guess it is time to switch llvm-defaults to llvm 2.9. I will have a look but I don't know when I will be able to find some time in the next few weeks.
S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org