Dear Matteo, While I'm just a user like you, let me share a few details with you.
The situation is the same even on amd64. See for instance :- $ apt-show-versions -a brasero brasero 2.30.3-2 install ok installed brasero 2.30.3-2 stable http.us.debian.org brasero 2.30.3-2 testing http.us.debian.org brasero 2.30.3-2 sid http.us.debian.org brasero 3.0.0-1+b1 experimental ftp.us.debian.org brasero/stable uptodate 2.30.3-2 While there are certainly other developers who are doing this, the main guy who has been trying to push the changes is Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org There is another part of the story is well. While I do not know a better way of crawling the Debian BTS I do know that sometimes the experimental versions . For instance a bug I reported which I later closed when I came to know it was because I had network-manager from experimental. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630856 So unless there is a way to figure out if there are no serious *known* bugs hampering the transition to sid/unstable it is/would be probably unwise to say anything. I've been waiting for almost 2 months now and do understand that the developer and maintainer resources are scare. Also its a volunteer project so cannot ask much. As a tracking bug its good to have. Also its good to check out www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-3.0-status.html to keep an eye on the transition. Just my 2 paise. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org