On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:31:17PM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> If this is ever going to get done. The best way is with character
> encoding.  > e.g. encoder: http://www.wbwip.com/wbw/emailencoder.html
> 
> Then the normal mailto: links won't be broken and hence this method
> poses no inconvenience to the user.

Is there any indication that such encoding actually fools spammers?

-- 
Jon Dowland

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to