also sprach Jelle de Jong <[email protected]> [2011.07.08.2002 +0200]:
> Thank you for the report! Your request for unpaper is valid, I see
> enough cases where this may be usable.
> 
> I have been thinking about a way for users to run there own scripts
> 
> I may add an --script ... options that allows a path to a script or
> application that can run on the page.

I'd suggest --script-dir too.

> That will be called in the processing script as first step before the
> image will be used. The input image can then be changed by this
> "script/app" as the users wishes...

What would be input and output of this script?

> Will this fill your needs?

Sure, although a tighter integration of unpaper would probably
benefit more users and require less local customisation. It's a nice
piece of software.

> I have also been looking at OCR for the DJVU output, but have not
> yet succeeded in usable OCR results in Dutch or English with floss
> software...

Yes, I have not been going anywhere near OCR yet. Btw, it would be
good for PDF too, not just DjVu.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"no survivors? then where do the stories come from I wonder?"
                                               -- captain jack sparrow

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply via email to