On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:59:29 +0200 Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> wrote:
> On sam., 2011-07-09 at 10:29 +0100, codeh...@debian.org wrote: > > libxfce4ui (4.8.0-2) appears in this list as a source package because > > one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain > > .la files. > > Where exactly do you see it? libxfce4ui: dependency_libs links-not-existing-la line 358. $ grep -n "^libxfce4ui" current.txt 358:libxfce4ui: dependency_libs links-not-existing-la /usr/lib/glade3/modules/libxfce4uiglade.la $ dpkg -c glade-xfce_4.8.0-2_amd64.deb |grep "\.la" -rw-r--r-- root/root 1462 2011-04-19 14:58 ./usr/lib/glade3/modules/libxfce4uiglade.la # Libraries that this one depends upon. dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libxfce4ui-1.la -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lstartup-notification-1 -lxfce4util -lgladeui-1 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/lib/libxml2.la /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.la /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.la /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la -lm /usr/lib/libcairo.la /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.la /usr/lib/libfreetype.la -lfontconfig /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.la -lrt /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.la' Yes, usually the .la file is in a -dev package, in your case it's in a module. The rest of the .la file is probably fine and necessary. The dependency_libs is not. So this is probably a case where the .la file can be retained but even then, the dependency_libs setting still needs to be cleared. There are example commands on the Wiki page. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval HTH -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpbUeqeKPfFP.pgp
Description: PGP signature