[Michael Biebl]
> Neither splashy nor plymouth is using this API.

How do splashy and umount handle interactive queries (ie requests for
password or the fsck questions) and the fsck progress status?

> So it only adds unnecessary complexity and slows down boot.

Make sense to me, given that there is an alternative in place to solve
the same problem.  If not, I suspect it is better to get splashy and
plymouth to use this API. :)

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to