Michael Biebl wrote: > Joey, do you have any ideas on how to address this issue? Could "empty" > options > be treated specially? Should a special keyword be used for such a case? > > In case you think this should better be addressed in cdbs, please reassign the > bug. In don't really care if this is handled in cdbs or debhelper as long as I > have a way to skip certain binary packages when using dh_strip in cdbs (when > using a current compat level).
It makes no sense to try to support --debug-package= as a way to disable previous --debug-package=foo. I'm frankly surprised that ever worked for you, looking at the code the first one specified wins -- but that is not documented behavior either. The only thing that could be done in debhelper would be to add a --no-debug-package switch. But, this switch would make no sense whatsoever to users who were not using cdbs, so I think that this should be dealt with in cdbs some how. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
