On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:15:27 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote:

> forwarded 635644
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=757308&aid=3381993&group_id=143975
> tags 635644 upstream
> thanks

It seems to me that the bug does not yet show up as
forwarded on the BTS web interface: I suspect that breaking the
"forwarded" command line confused the control bot...

> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Francesco Poli
> <invernom...@paranoici.org> wrote:
[...]
> > Maybe the first time Fluxbox is started, it is not fast enough to do
> > something that is needed by Conky, and the latter fails to start
> > because of this. The next times Fluxbox is started (without rebooting
> > the box), it is faster to load, due to memory caches and similar tricks
> > performed by the kernel: as a consequence, Conky finds Fluxbox fully
> > initialized (or more initialized, anyway) and is able to start
> > properly.
> > This is all I can imagine, as a guessed explanation...
> > Could it be? Or am I completely off-track?
> 
> At the moment, that sounds like the most reasonable explanation for this 
> bug...

Good, let's hope it helps to pinpoint the cause of the bug.

> 
> > Well, I think it *is* a bug, even though we *may* have found a way to
> > work around it.
> > Hence, it would be very nice of you, if you could forward the bug
> > report upstream...
> 
> I've just forwarded the bug upstream; see
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=757308&aid=3381993&group_id=143975
> (if there's anything I've overlooked, feel free to add a comment).

Thank you so much!
I think you summarized the bug report adequately, and there's the URL
of the full Debian bug report, anyway.

Let's wait and see.

Thanks again for your kind assistance!


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpTPdTbcfFUK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to