Le Fri 29/07/2011, Petter Reinholdtsen disait
> unarchive 602901
> reopen 602901 1.14.0-2
> thanks
> 
> [Erwan David]
> > $named should include +unbound, otherwise some services needing DNS
> > are started before DNS is available
> 
> I believe this is the wrong fix.  It is more sensible to fix it in the
> unbound package, by adding a file /etc/insserv.conf.d/unbound with its
> definition of the $named virtual facility, ie
> 
>   $named +unbound
> 
> or
> 
>   $named unbound
> 
> depending on the strengh of the dependency.
> 
> I believe this to be the correct fix for this problem, and thus reopen
> this issue to start the process of getting rid of this +unbound (and
> the +bind9 etc) entries in /etc/insserv.conf.
> 
> I've been asked by paravoid on IRC to fix this problem in stable as
> well, but believe it should be fixed also in unstable in the unbound
> package and not in insserv.
> 
> Happy hacking,


I had the impression that ifeach package just put this $named <package>, then 
you'll get a $named with only one of the package nales, whereas you want all of 
them to be used for computing the order.
        
        If I have both bind and unbound on the same machine, I must start them 
both before starting any service which needs the DNS.
        
I may be able to start with just one of them, but that would depend on the 
configuration, and packages cannot know which one is compulsory.



-- 
Erwan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to