Le Fri 29/07/2011, Petter Reinholdtsen disait > unarchive 602901 > reopen 602901 1.14.0-2 > thanks > > [Erwan David] > > $named should include +unbound, otherwise some services needing DNS > > are started before DNS is available > > I believe this is the wrong fix. It is more sensible to fix it in the > unbound package, by adding a file /etc/insserv.conf.d/unbound with its > definition of the $named virtual facility, ie > > $named +unbound > > or > > $named unbound > > depending on the strengh of the dependency. > > I believe this to be the correct fix for this problem, and thus reopen > this issue to start the process of getting rid of this +unbound (and > the +bind9 etc) entries in /etc/insserv.conf. > > I've been asked by paravoid on IRC to fix this problem in stable as > well, but believe it should be fixed also in unstable in the unbound > package and not in insserv. > > Happy hacking,
I had the impression that ifeach package just put this $named <package>, then you'll get a $named with only one of the package nales, whereas you want all of them to be used for computing the order. If I have both bind and unbound on the same machine, I must start them both before starting any service which needs the DNS. I may be able to start with just one of them, but that would depend on the configuration, and packages cannot know which one is compulsory. -- Erwan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org