On 07/07/2011 11:58 PM, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Gerardo Esteban Malazdrewicz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is possible you want to mix propietary files provided by MaxMind and the >> free ones. >> At this point, the files provided by this packages would overwrite >> propietary files. >> >> Please provide an option to decide which free database(s) to update, and >> which ones to be left alone. > > I also agree that we should not rename the .dat file. > Patrick, what about using update-alternatives instead of renaming it?
Reopening this bug, I thought it had already been reopened. Unless someone objects, I am going to add a symlink from /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIPCity.dat to /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLiteCity.dat managed under update-alternatives. I will then consider the issue fixed from the point of view of this package. However another debian contrib package should be created for downloading and managing with update-alternatives the payed version of the database. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
