>>>>> "PR" == Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> writes: PR> Care to explain why you report this here? It hardly seem surprising PR> that changing the ordering from 2 to 0 affect this behavior. What did PR> you expect would happen? I expected that checkfs would be run after the disks had a chance to mount. Instead there is a race condition. There is too much parallelism in the initscripts. All I know is in a couple more seconds the device is ready, but checkfs was already run.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
