On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:31:46PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 02:02:52AM -0300, Rafael Cunha de Almeida wrote: > > If I try to compile an extension using CGC (instead of 3m), I get the > > following error: > > > > $mzc --cgc --ld example.so example.o example_wrap.o > > link-extension: (/usr/bin/gcc -fPIC -shared example.o example_wrap.o > > /usr/lib/racket/mzdyn.o -o example.so) > > link-extension: > > gcc-4.4.real: /usr/lib/racket/mzdyn.o: No such file or directory > > > > I think it'll just be a matter of setting the correct compilation flags. > > Actually, it's a matter of the amd64 packages using the 3m garbage > collector instead of CGC. Our packages, like upstreams, only provide > the binaries/libraries for one GC which means you have > /usr/lib/racket/mzdyn3m.o installed, not /usr/lib/racket/mzdyn.o. The > description of the racket package specifies which GC was built. > > I consider this reasonable behavior and will close the bug unless you > have any objections.
I think that, ideally, both would be added. However, I understand that it might be technically complicated. So I suggest that mzc returns a small explanation of the error. Something in the lines: CGC garbage collector not supported. what do you think? The current error makes it look like there's something wrong with the package or the system. []'s Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
