Package: autobook Severity: serious Justification: DFSG Hi,
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html , it is explained why the OPL (Open Publication License) v1 is considered to be non-DFSG-free. All 3 reasons also apply to the "OPEN PUBLICATION LICENSE Draft v0.4, 8 June 1999", as used by the autobook. Therefore, OPL v0.4 is non-DFSG-free, and the autobook package should be removed from main. See Bug #136197 for a discussion dating from May 2002 about the Autobook and licensing. It's a pity people taking part in that discussion weren't aware of the additional restrictions in the OPL :( It might be reasonable to choose not to upload autobook to non-free: the content is getting obsolete anyway. Bye, Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
