Hello Robert, On 07/18/2011 07:42 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it > depends unconditionally on fuse-utils. > > If pytagsfs depends on fuse-utils only to ensure that FUSE support is enabled, > please consider adjusting the dependency to something like: > > Depends: fuse [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any] > > (example uses "fuse" because fuse-utils is now a transitional package that > depends on fuse) > > Else if pytagsfs depends on fuse-utils because it works better when the > fusermount command is available, but this is not an essential requirement, > please consider lowering it to a recommendation, like: > > Recommends: fuse [linux-any] > > (example uses "fuse" because fuse-utils is now a transitional package that > depends on fuse) > > Else if pytagsfs depends on fuse-utils because it can't work at all without > fusermount, please reply to this bug report so we can try to find a solution.
Can you suggest a change here? dh_gencontrol dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Recommends field contains an arch-specific dependency but the package is architecture all dh_gencontrol: dpkg-gencontrol -ldebian/changelog -Tdebian/pytagsfs.substvars -Pdebian/pytagsfs returned exit code 255 make: *** [binary-indep] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 E: Failed autobuilding of package Since pytagsfs doesn't have a dependency for its execution, I've added "fuse [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any]" as the Recommends. With "Architecture: all", this combination fails with the above mentioned build fauilure. Where as with "Architecture: any", the build has failed in my last upload. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pytagsfs -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
