On 09.08.2011 04:22, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > On 07/07/2011 11:58 PM, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Gerardo Esteban Malazdrewicz >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It is possible you want to mix propietary files provided by MaxMind and the >>> free ones. >>> At this point, the files provided by this packages would overwrite >>> propietary files. >>> >>> Please provide an option to decide which free database(s) to update, and >>> which ones to be left alone. >> >> I also agree that we should not rename the .dat file.t >> Patrick, what about using update-alternatives instead of renaming it? > > Reopening this bug, I thought it had already been reopened. > > Unless someone objects, I am going to add a symlink from > /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIPCity.dat to /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLiteCity.dat > managed under update-alternatives. > I will then consider the issue fixed from the point of view of this > package. However another debian contrib package should be created for > downloading and managing with update-alternatives the payed version of > the database. > > Thanks, > Ludovico > > >
I ACK with it, could you implement it please? -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] */
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
