Sorry for the delay in my reply; I've been caught up in the
back-to-school rush lately.
I'd like to propose my original solution [1] to bug #579102 when I
adopted conky, i.e. have two conky source packages ("conky" in main,
"conky-all" in contrib); src:conky would build conky-cli and
conky-std, both without Nvidia support, while src:conky-all would
build a binary conky-all package with Nvidia support, and thus be
placed in contrib. This would ensure that conky complies with Policy,
while not removing any features, and cater to both main and contrib
users.
Aron, please review and sponsor when you have time to do so:
$ dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/conky/conky_1.8.1-5.dsc
$ dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/c/conky-all/conky-all_1.8.1-5.dsc
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579102#47
Kind regards,
- Vincent Cheng
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
