> Before I close this bug, could you please confirm this is done on > purpose ? My intial understanding when you volonteer to help on the > paraview package, was that paraview package should only contains > anything needed by paraview application at run time. While > paraview-dev would be a package for building third party module...
The idea was to put header-files into the separate binary to unload a little bit paraview itself. That is it. I am not against reshuffling some files between paraview and paraview-dev. I am just against of strong hard-coding, which can lead to a mess. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
