Michael Gilbert wrote: > What can we do about this? It seems like the correct solution is to > get the patch you mention [0] applied to the xorg packages, so > shouldn't this be reassigned there?
What are your thoughts on this? I'm inclined to reassign it unless there's some reason not to. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
