Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:35:08PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> >> Well, I can write up a patch and send it to upstream, but that's >> no guarantee it'll be picked up. It is a backward-incompatible >> change. >> >> If that's what you want, I can probably do it sometime this >> week. (I am very busy right now.) > > That is all I'm asking.
I believe that the following patch fixes the problem: diff -ur tmp/autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 --- tmp/autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 2005-09-14 21:50:55.000000000 -0700 +++ autoconf-2.59a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 2005-09-14 21:47:42.000000000 -0700 @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ else dnl If we are called with less than 3 arguments, use the defaults m4_ifval([$3], [_AC_PATH_X($@)], - [_AC_PATH_X([Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)])]) + [_AC_PATH_X([X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()])]) fi eval "$ac_cv_have_x" fi # $with_x != no A binary package built with this patch is available from: http://footstool.stanford.edu/~blp/autoconf_2.59a-3.1_all.deb Please confirm that this fixes the problem for you and I will pass it along to upstream. -- "In the PARTIES partition there is a small section called the BEER. Prior to turning control over to the PARTIES partition, the BIOS must measure the BEER area into PCR[5]." --TCPA PC Specific Implementation Specification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]