Hi, Am Montag, den 19.09.2011, 15:30 +0000 schrieb Clint Adams: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:05:17AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > I note that, at least on i386, the build wound up picking up > > libghc-persistent-dev 0.6.1-1+b1 rather than the current (and > > presumably corresponding) 0.6.2-1; perhaps a tighter build dependency > > is in order. > > Possibly; I'm not sure what the right thing to do is, considering > the DHG's policy of mirroring the .cabal file dependencies.
let me clarify: The policy should be that the Debian dependencies imply the cabal dependencies. It is perfectly fine to have them tighter. This is for example what I did in criterion with regard to char when I enabled gtk support in both. > > At any rate, could you please take a look? > > A simple give-back should do the trick if libghc-persistent-dev 0.6.2 > is available on the architecture. I uploaded a version with a tighter bound. A give back would have been enough, but this was not much more work. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
