Moi Jari, thanks for the summary. I now finally understand that you've packaged http://st.suckless.org/ before I added it to the suckless-tools package. Sorry about that.
On 21 September 2011 13:24, jari <jari.aa...@cante.net> wrote: > 3) problem with suckless-tools: collection of unrelated various > utilities in one package causes unnecessary coupling. > 4) user interested only in light weight terminal emulator can > install it from "stterm" package, not requiring to install > unrelated software. They are very small binaries and kinda related in the sense they provide tools related to a linux working environment which doesn't suck. > 5) I've been in contact from start with the upstream providing > enhancement patches. I know upstream well too and I do find it worrying your packaging is ~1k of SLOC. You obviously missed the suckless manifesto! Nonetheless I am happy to remove st from suckless-tools. Tomorrow I'll try work out what Daniel means by my crappy changelog formatting and make the necessary changes to remove st from the packaging. If you have upload rights, I would ask you please to sponsor Connor. Many thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
