tags 564971 + pending thanks Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for clamfs (versioned as 1.0.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Andrew Lloyd Webber & Tim Rice
diff -u clamfs-1.0.1/debian/changelog clamfs-1.0.1/debian/changelog
--- clamfs-1.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ clamfs-1.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+clamfs (1.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix "ftbfs with gcc-4.5": add patch from Ubuntu / Colin Watson:
+ - Fix ExpireLRUCache constructor naming.
+ Closes: #564971
+ LP: #749048
+
+ -- gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:53:10 +0200
+
clamfs (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version (Closes: #560472)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- clamfs-1.0.1.orig/src/scancache.cxx
+++ clamfs-1.0.1/src/scancache.cxx
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
}
ScanCache::ScanCache(long int elements, long int expire):
- ExpireLRUCache<ino_t, CachedResult>::ExpireLRUCache<ino_t, CachedResult>(elements, expire) {
+ ExpireLRUCache<ino_t, CachedResult>::ExpireLRUCache(elements, expire) {
}
ScanCache::~ScanCache() {
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
