On Oct 01, Richard Kettlewell <r...@greenend.org.uk> wrote:

> -rw-r--r-- 1 syslog adm       0 May 15 04:15 /var/log/news/news.crit
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syslog adm    1059 Aug 20 13:20 /var/log/news/news.err
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syslog adm 6399076 Oct  1 09:10 /var/log/news/news.notice
> 
> This is enforced by the syslogd package (every time it starts up).
Since when?
inn has always cooperated with the standard syslogd.

> This would be broken even if the cat didn't fail due to the file
> permissions - if a message is logged after the copy but before the
> cat then it will be lost.  Better would be to rename the file aside,
> create a new one and signal syslogd to make it re-open it - except
> that all this runs as news so cannot signal syslogd.
Yes, everybody knows this. So it is not going to change soon...

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to