On 18.07.2011 16:12, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: mumble > Severity: wishlist > User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: linux-any > > The debian/control file in mumble uses a negated list of architectures > to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a > Linux-specific package. I.e. something like: > > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] > > This is problematic because it will fail for any future kfreebsd-* or hurd-* > architecture (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel port). The correct way > would be to use dpkg architecture wildcards, e.g.: > > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [linux-any] > > Please consider making this adjustment to make life easier for future > porting efforts. > > Thanks!
Hi I am closing this report, because wo do not have such depends. We only have: a) a b-d which only excludes hurd, but not kfreebsd b) a b-d which only excludes kfreebsd, but not hurd -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature