Package: dpatch Version: 2.0.14 Severity: wishlist Hi again,
It is confusing that dpatch-convert-diffgz and dpatch-edit-patch have different syntaxes. From their manpages: dpatch-convert-diffgz patchno patchname dpatch-edit-patch [options] command dpatchname However if my patch is 01_first.dpatch, then I need the following commands of different syntaxes: dpatch-convert-diffgz 01 first dpatch-edit-patch patch 01_first For the sake of consistency, either: 1) dpatch-convert-diffgz should take a single parameter (01_first) or 2) dpatch-edit-patch should be modified to accept patchno as a parameter. It seems to me that option #1 is preferable: always have the user specify the complete patch name (i.e. 01_first). Charles -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'stable'), (70, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) dpatch depends on no packages. Versions of packages dpatch recommends: ii dpkg-dev 1.13.11 package building tools for Debian ii fakeroot 1.5.1 Gives a fake root environment ii patchutils 0.2.31-1 Utilities to work with patches -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
