Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 10:08 +0200, D. Barbier a écrit : > On 2011/10/11 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Dear Denis, > > > > Denis (and others on the CC list), what do you think? Can we keep the > > same source package name, unless/until OCE diverges away from the main > > OCCT? > > I have mixed feelings about package names. OCE developers decided to > not use OCC or OpenCascade names in order to make it clear that this > product is not endorsed by OpenCascade SAS. On the other hand, it is > of course much more convenient to keep the same names. My preference > goes to s/opencascade/oce/ in source and binary package names though. Idem. Different teams, "different" projects => different names...
Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
