On 2011-10-17 00:40, Francesco Poli wrote: > I still have to carefully read the rest of the your reply, but, first, > I have to ask a question about this workaround: I am considering using > a Pin-Priority of -30000 (which has the advantage of being > representable as a 16-bit signed integer, just in case some tool is > going to read it using such a small data type...). > > Do you think it can be sufficiently low?
Yes, it's sufficiently low for most cases, which I think is enough for a workaround. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
