Thanks for what I expected to be your response, ``Experimental.''
What I failed to clearly get across is that even if it's in Experimental I cannot test it to help give feedback so that it can more rapidly move to Sid/Unstable, due to the fact the staggered release of packages keeps me from testing it fully.
In short, if I can't do a full dist-upgrade of Gnome to 3.2.x in Experimental, what's the point of trickling in packages when it really needs one concerted staging where all necessary packages are first built and then uploaded to Experimental, at once.
I can understand if it takes a week to get packages up. When it takes 3 to 4 weeks for all necessary packages to be uploaded before one can even run it without a broken shell [Gnome Shell currently breaks] it's really a poor reflection on the process.
- Marc On 10/24/2011 04:48 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 23 octobre 2011 à 22:17 -0700, Marc J. Driftmeyer a écrit :If you want people to bang on this release you're gonna have to do better getting the entire dependency tree updated before you start hitting Experimental with updates. Otherwise, it's nothing but a bunch of angry testers losing interest in testing Gnome 3.x.I’m not sure I understand well: are you actually complaining of broken packages in *experimental* ?
-- Marc J. Driftmeyer Email :: m...@reanimality.com <mailto:m...@reanimality.com> Web :: http://www.reanimality.com Cell :: (509) 435-5212
<<attachment: mjd.vcf>>
