Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2011, 17:34 +0200 schrieb Martin Pitt: Hello Martin, > Hello Christoph, > > Christoph Berg [2011-09-18 19:37 +0200]: > > I think it is necessary, just because a logrotate version was > > (un)available at build time doesn't mean that this will be the case at > > run time. > > > > Actually, the problem exists both ways, so unless I forgot some > > detail, p-common will probably need a Breaks: logrotate (<< 3.8) with > > the hack (or a Depends) and a Breaks: logrotate (>= 3.8) without it. > > Right, that'd be really correct. Done in bzr now. > > Martin >
Wouldn't it be possible to add the line in the postinst-step ? Or remove the line, if logrotate-version is less than 3.8 (I guess removing is easier and less errorprone) ? This should work for all versions including the backports. -- Jens Lody (Un-)official debian-repository for Code::Blocks: http://apt.jenslody.de/ |\ _,,,---,,_ /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ <|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
