On 2011-10-16 15:30, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 01:22:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>, 2011-10-15, 18:03: >>>>> The "debug" section contains debugging symbols, which should >>>>> always have priority extra. Policy specifically mentions them >>>>> in the description of priority extra. >>>>> >>>>> Please consider warning about any packages in section "debug" >>>>> with any priority higher than "extra". >>>> >>>> We do check all packages named *-dbg for that >>>> (debug-package-should-be-priority-extra). >>> >>> Ah, good to know. And it looks like lintian also already checks >>> that any package containing debug symbols follows that naming >>> convention, which together check that any package containing debug >>> symbols has priority extra. :) >> >> Right, that's debug-package-should-be-named-dbg. >> >>> Neither of those ensure that such packages have section "debug", >>> though. >> >> There is wrong-section-according-to-package-name, which should >> trigger for all *-dbg packages that are not in section "debug". > > Oh, awesome, thanks. > > - Josh Triplett > > >
Hey, By the looks of this, there is nothing to be done. If so, I will close this bug. :) ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
