Hello On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:14:06AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > pe, 2005-09-16 kello 21:58 +0200, Ola Lundqvist kirjoitti: > > It was needed when I created the package. Unless this was done > > every nfs client was updating the same file and thus made all systems > > not working. > > OK, that explains why it's done. > > > > Moreover, if the system happens to not have proc mounted, the code will > > > create a broken system. (Happened to me in a chroot without proc; it is > > > fairly unlikely to happen in a real system, but not impossible.) > > > > Well in that case I do not think this package should be used. > > > > However I created this package for potato and thus things may > > have changed over the years. I do not know if this is still needed. > > > > Do you know? > > I have no idea. I don't use nfsbooted, I merely tested it with piuparts > (along with other packages in etch). > > *At least* you should warn the sysadmin of what is happening (using > debconf in some way). Silent reconfigurations of the system behind their > back is bad.
I agree. Regards, // Ola > > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
