On 15/11/11 21:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ximin Luo <infini...@gmx.com> writes: > >> The text explaining the "or" part appears nowhere as well, when DEP5 >> forces me to split the tri-license paragraph. The two situations are >> equivalent, yet you're choosing different solutions for each! > > That's a good point, and I think that's a bug in DEP5. > >> Alternatively, treat License stanzas as published licenses, and place >> preamble information in License/Comment entries in File stanzas. This is >> a much cleaner solution and what I had been interpreting DEP5 to mean. > > That's certainly a reasonable way of expressing that information. It's > not what DEP5 currently says, though, and I'm fairly sure that's > intentional (from following the original discussion). But it does seem > like a reasonable change. >
OK, cool :) I will write up a more detailed description of this and submit it to debian-policy tonight. -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0 https://bitbucket.org/infinity0 https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
