On mer., 2011-11-16 at 19:43 +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > > I really meant the critical severity of this bug as it is breaking other > parts of the distribution, not knowing that a user is logged in when it is > seems like a security critical bug to me, but even if it isn't, breaking > other parts of the distro calls for a critical bug.
No, please re-read policy. Overestimating the severity won't help fixing the bug. Quite the contrary in fact, it just pisses me off and doesn't exactly motivates me. > > Anyway, the severity was not to annoy anybody but because I meant it and I'd > like this bug to get fixed, I have tested version 1.0.6-2 of the package on > a different machine and the bug is still there. Well, sure, everyone likes bugs to be fixed, including me. But the right way is to report bugs the most accurately possible. And then provide patches. > > I don't know what info can I send you to help fix this bug, can you at least > tell me if you are able to reproduce this on any machine? I have no idea, you didn't really tell what you expected and what was different. lightdm just works for me. I assume this is like https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/871070 which has way better information than this one... Could you at least confirm? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
