[ if you are replying to bugs, please let the bug Cc'ed ] Hi,
Am Tuesday 20 September 2005 15:06 schrieben Sie: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > OOo2 may build on amd64 but working is another matter and thefefore > > amd64 is not included in that Architecture line. > > ... > > Anyway, my local copy here has a amd64 conditional, amd64 gets added to > > that line if it's enabled in debian/rules, which sense is questionable. > > Or do you want a OOo that builds but is not uselful/is unstable? > > Just a difference of opinion. I would rather have something that is > almost useless than nothing at all. As unstable as it is, it still let > me open and view a spreadsheet. And it is about as reliable as mozilla > for amd64, which crashes after opening just a cople of web pages. But the point here is that packages in unstable should be in principle releasable. Which is not the case for a office suite failing even simple tasks. And unstable isn't a world on it's own, packages from there go to testing and into a stable release. For that I would need to disable amd64 anyway so it makes no sense to enable it in the first place unless it works. Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73