Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck: > libghemical is not binNMU-ready: > > mba@hartree:~/build$ dpkg -I libghemical5_2.99.1-2+b1_amd64.deb | grep > Depends > Depends: libblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base, libc6 (>= > 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgfortran3 (>= 4.3), liblapack3gf | > liblapack.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base, libmopac7-1gf, libopenmpi1.3, > libquadmath0 (>= 4.6), libsc7, libstdc++6 (>= 4.6), libghemical-data (= > 2.99.1-2) > > It depends on libghemical-data=2.99.1-2, thus making it unsinstallable > AFAICT.
You are IMO completely wrong or I misunderstand you. The package is binNMU-safe (we made it binNMU-safe after #435945) and the above is what I expect. For the arch:any package libgehmical5 the version is increased by the binNMU, but for the arch:all package libghemical-data it is not. So libgehmical5=2.99.1-2+b1 *must* depend on libghemical-data=2.99.1-2 What's your problem with this result? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
