Osamu-san, thank you for your mail.
On 26.11.2011 03:31, Osamu Aoki wrote: > What I meant is homepage field is not > valid in control file. This is a sign of inactive upstream etc. So this > is not just cosmetic issue. No, it's not just a cosmetic issue, I fully agree. But it's not immediate reason for removal, either. And most certainly not in the way you are attempting. > You seem to be asking private communication. But that gets lost. > Debian is about openness. There's a place for private communication and there's a place for public communication. OTOH, I don't see a place for your current, single-handed crusade to get scim and all its packages removed from Debian when you are at most co-maintainer in the packages. All the while not even specifically informing the maintainers and co-maintainers about your intentions and actions. As maintainer of the main scim package I've already told you numerous times over the last two months that I have no intentions to let the scim users who outnumber ibus users 20 to 1 down without good reason. If that entails joining maintainership for a few more packages, so be it. I have no motivation to run around after you, having to publicly state again and again in ever more places that your crusade is dead in the water. Scim is here to stay, at least for another while, so please stop! Remove yourself from packages you no longer have an interest to co-maintain and otherwise please have the courtesy to stop wasting my time. With kind regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
