On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Maximiliano Curia <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not exactly sure that the permissions should be handled this way, in fact > I > would prefer a way to enforce permissions from the server side. But, if you > are interested in this feature it might be worth applying the patch or trying > to convince upstream (the authors) to accept it.
See this more recent discussion about the same issue: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.fuse.sshfs/1207 So part of the problem can be solved on the server side. The other part (more fine grained control of permission bits on client side) is still up for debate. Thanks, Miklos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
