Package: ntfsprogs Version: 2.0.0-1+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, silently replacing ntfsprogs with ntfs-3g, without even prompting the users that there could be problems, is something i just don't agree with.
I understand that upstream has merged, but AT LEAST informing the users of such changes would be nice, since these changes could lead to inexplicable failures in some configurations. Bye -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ntfsprogs depends on: ii fuse-utils 2.8.6-4 ii libc6 2.13-24 ii libfuse2 2.8.6-4 ii libntfs10 2.0.0-1+b1 ii libuuid1 2.20.1-1 ntfsprogs recommends no packages. ntfsprogs suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
