-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Frederic,
Il 03/01/2012 11:55, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel ha scritto: > Le Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:45:09 +0100, Antonio Valentino > <antonio.valent...@tiscali.it> a écrit : > >> Hi Frédéric-Emmanuel, >> >> Il 02/01/2012 19:39, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel ha scritto: >>> Hello, I am a DD and I would like to see the new upstream >>> version in debian. So dear maintainer is it ok for you to >>> offer co-maintainance of pytables to Yaroslav Halchenko. >>> >>> Yaroslav can you put the pytables package on >>> debian.mentors.net that way it would be easier for me to review >>> your package. >>> >>> thanks >>> >> >> I don't know if Yaroslav has a package to posh in >> http://mentors.debian.net too. >> >> I uploaded my one [1], please consider to give it a look. > > ok I see at least one problem here :) the version number should be > > > 2.3.1-1.1 -> 2.3.1-1 > Yes, since I was not able to contact the current maintainer of PyTables I prepared the package for a NMU. Of course I can fix it pretty soon > I did not look further for now but it would be nice to share your > packaging efforts under the umbrella of debian-science. Could you > look here [1] or here [2], and if you agreed to be part of > debian-science, I would set-up an initial pytables git repository > for the packaging using all the material available from debian > snapshot. > > cheers, > > Frederic > > [1] > http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html > [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience > OK, it would be very nice, thanks. I already have an account on alioth: a_valentino-guest Please let me know if I have to file a join request or if you can add me to the debian-science team directly. > PS: I saw that you are part of pytables upstream. So in your > opinion is there API incompatibilities between the current stable > version 2.1.2 and the 2.3.1 version. > > There is already a few packages depending on python-pytables > > python-tables Reverse Depends: vitables tessa python-pandas > python-dipy python-cfflib > > so do your think that it could cause troubles to upload 2.3.1 ? > > thanks > > Frederic No, we took care in not breaking the API in the 2.x line, so upgrading to 2.3.1 should be safe. best regards - -- Antonio Valentino -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8C4a8ACgkQ1JUs2CS3bP5lxwCgtTVzw4lwvm4XSVDgFVmi190K /kMAnR6+eB0nV9w/glE2Wa3KmDnr+yf7 =QeKH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
