--On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:01 PM -0800 Russ Allbery
<r...@debian.org> wrote:
Do you think that's sufficient, or should I clarify this further?
No, I think that's fine. I'm just a little worried that we'll get bitten
by some future libdb change, but actually OpenLDAP may serve as an
excellent canary there. If libdb changes either the file format or the
ABI in a way that isn't compatible without changing the SONAME, that's an
RC bug in libdb from Debian's perspective and it's something we'd rather
know about than not, since we need to fix it regardless of OpenLDAP's use
of the package.
Personally, I'm hoping Debian will dump back-bdb/back-hdb entirely once
back-mdb is stable. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
