Hi, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (05 Jan 2012 10:51:33 GMT) : > The problem is indeed fixed by the 0.9.10-1 package of backupninja. > Given the changelog, it was probably already fixed by 0.9.9-1 but > I have not tested that version. Thanks for the heads up.
> I recommend a backport of 0.9.10-1 to stable. I'm not sure what you mean, so let me describe my plans for clarity's sake. I don't want to push 0.9.10 into squeeze-backports merely to workaround bugs in 0.9.8.1-1. This is not what backports are meant for, I'm told. However, once a few remaining bugs (mainly in the rsync handler) that affect stable are fixed, I do intend to prepare something for s-p-u. 0.9.9 and 0.9.10 are not purely bugfix releases so I fear we cannot push 0.9.10 as is into a stable update. A great number of bugfixes will be worth being cherry-picked, though. Cheers, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | If you must label the absolute, use it's proper name: Temporary. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
