lördag den 7 januari 2012 klockan 21:52 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 21:00:59 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > lördag den 7 januari 2012 klockan 20:32 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > > > I guess you mean IPv6 when you say INET? That's certainly a nice > > > feature, but I'm not sure all the previous drawbacks outweight it. > > > > The logger from bsdutils uses only UNIX sockets, whereas inetutils-logger > > is able so sent messages directed to IPv4 and IPv6 INET sockets, hence my > > phrasing "INET socket", in addition message passing to host local UNIX > > sockets. > > Well I see bsdutils' logger supporting IPv4 UDP and TCP connections, > in addition to Unix sockets, witness its --socket, --udp, --server > and --port options.
The logger(1) present in the binary package bsdutils in version 1:2.19.1-5 certainly lacks INET support, likewise the manual page logger(1) clearly relates to UNIX sockets only. The output of $ strings -a /usr/bin/logger | egrep 'socket|udp|port|server is on architecture linux-i386 only finding "socket" as appearing in $ logger -u socket Tell me where and two related messages. None of the switches you mention. Does this mean that LaMont Jones is shipping a crippled logger(1)? Regards, Mats -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
