Hi, Aurelien Jarno: > > Printing this sort of message should be controlled by a flag (or an > > environment variable), and default to off. It's only of interest to > > people who want to improve qemu, not users. > > I fully disagree. Missing syscall means that some syscall are simply > ignore and not emulated. This is something that has to be fixed as soon > as possible, as depending on the syscall it might be data corruption. > Umm, does such a message not indicate a return of ENOSYS to (emulated) userspace?
> In the case of syscall 341 in arm, it is implemented since version 0.14. > Which version are you actually using? The bug report says 1.0+dfsg-1 for > which the problem should not exist. > I'll have to check whether the chroot had the current version. (It should have.) -- -- Matthias Urlichs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
