On Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> severity 331116 normal
> thank you
>
> On 09.01.2012 19:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > 6 years later isdnlog also fails to purge, thus I'm raising the severity
> > to important.
>
> Holger, stop that nonsense RIGHT NOW! isdnutils has many legacy
> problems, they are being worked on by the new maintainer. The time a
> ticket has been open has got absolutely nothing to do with its
> severity. I kindly ask you to review
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities before you increase the
> workload for an already overworked maintainer by forcing him to reverse
> your unwarranted changes. I suggest you reverse the nonsensical changes
> you made to the other reports as well.
>
> I will not respond to any "discussion" you may or may not try to force
> on me in the BTS when the meaning of severity is clearly spelled out, I
> don't have time to waste on that. The time a ticket has been open has
> got nothing to do with severity.
Hi Rolf,
"a piuparts clean archive" is a release goal since etch or lenny (too tired to
remember or look up), in any case since many years. Failing to purge is, well,
an important policy violation. It's not serious, true, but it's also not a
normal bug in a package. Debian wants to release packages which can be purged
properly to us, that's a release goal.
That said, I'm glad to learn that isdnlog found a new maintainer willing to
bring this good old package into good shape again! Have fun and enjoy the
ride!
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
