On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of 
> > such functions. If none of them are present the error "no 
> > protectable libc functions used" is shown. However, there are also 
> > results that show "no" (e.g. /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr). As such, there 
> > might indeed be a problem with the LDFLAGS being overwritten.
> 
> Most of the binaries suffer from this, and in the end the reason 
> appears to be missing usage of CPPFLAGS when compiling C++ sources.

That's correct. I've meant CPPFLAGS.

Cheers,
        Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to